Cobit 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool Xls [Edge]

: The process is continuously improved to meet current and projected business goals. Assessment Report Components

Raters often look at the existence of a policy (Work Product) and rate the process highly. However, COBIT 2019 focuses heavily on Base Practices . You may have a "Change Management Policy" (Work Product), but if developers are bypassing the CAB (Base Practice failure), your rating should be low. The tool is designed to catch this discrepancy between documentation and reality. Cobit 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool Xls

: Strategic advice on which processes to improve first, based on their importance to enterprise goals (e.g., APO01 for IT strategy or EDM02 for risk). Stakeholder Analysis : Mapping roles and responsibilities using the COBIT 2019 RACI Chart Visual Dashboards : The process is continuously improved to meet

| Issue | Explanation | |-------|-------------| | | Uses 0–5 maturity scale (COBIT 5 or older), not COBIT 2019’s capability levels. Misaligns with ISACA’s current guidance. | | No attribute-level scoring | Real COBIT 2019 assessment requires scoring 10+ process attributes per process. Simple XLS tools skip this entirely. | | No rigorous evidence tracking | No place to link evidence for each rating – fails audit scrutiny. | | Subjective & inconsistent | Different assessors get wildly different results because criteria are vague. | | No normative vs. non-normative reference | COBIT 2019 distinguishes required vs. optional components – these tools ignore that. | | Lacks calibration guidance | Real assessments require base practices, work products, and rating guidelines – XLS tools rarely include these. | You may have a "Change Management Policy" (Work

Processes are proactive and well-defined across the organization.

Mastering Governance: The Ultimate Guide to the COBIT 2019 Maturity Assessment Tool (XLS)