PRI‑9905‑S9 is essentially to those pressures: it gives a baseline that all data‑sharing entities can rely on while still allowing states to impose stricter rules if they wish.
| | Description | |--------------|-----------------| | Civil Penalties | Up to $10,000 per violation (per dataset) plus a potential treble damages clause if the breach is willful. | | Criminal Liability | Only in cases of reckless disregard or intentional circumvention—up to $250,000 and 5 years imprisonment (rare). | | Federal Contract Suspension | Non‑compliant contractors may be barred from future federal contracts for up to 3 years . | | State Enforcement | States can impose additional penalties under their own privacy statutes. | statute pri9905s9
It is utilized by jail staff in LIDS to distinguish federal prisoners from those held on state or local charges. Classification and Context PRI‑9905‑S9 is essentially to those pressures: it gives
| | Obligation | |-----------------|----------------| | Federal agencies | Must apply an approved privacy‑preserving method before releasing any dataset that contains PII to external partners. | | State & local governments | Same requirement; can adopt stricter state‑specific standards. | | Private companies (e.g., SaaS providers, health‑tech firms, fintech, ad tech) | If they share data outside the organization (including with affiliates, partners, or public‑sector entities), they must meet the statute’s standards. | | Research institutions & universities | Must obtain “privacy‑preserving certification” for any data set that leaves the campus, even for publicly funded projects. | | Non‑profits | Covered when handling donor or client data that is shared with third‑party analysts. | or public‑sector entities)